evidoria

Browse practices

Catalogue: PES & Nature-Based Solutions clear

This selection at a glance

52
matching practices
6%
strong evidence, of 31 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 2
Observational / pre–post 23
Descriptive / self-reported 6

21 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.

Most practices in: United States of America (52)

Results

52 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
Denver Water — From Forests to Faucets Watershed Protection Partnership (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Denver, United States of America —
USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Washington, D.C., United States of America —
Kissimmee River Restoration — Reversing a Flood-Control Canal Back Into 44 Miles of Meandering River Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Okeechobee, United States of America —
Seattle's Cedar River Municipal Watershed — Filtration-Avoidance Water Source Protection (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Seattle, United States of America —
Pocosin Lakes Peatland Restoration & ACR Carbon Accounting Methodology (USA) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Columbia, United States of America —
Hawai'i Watershed Partnerships (HAWP) — Cooperative Forest Protection Against Invasive Species Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Honolulu, United States of America —
New York City Catskills watershed protection Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Catskills, New York, United States of America —
Yahara WINS — Watershed Adaptive Management Paying for Farm Phosphorus Cuts Instead of a Treatment-Plant Upgrade (Wisconsin, USA) Not assessed Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Madison, United States of America —
Elwha River Dam Removal — Reconnecting 70+ Miles of Salmon Habitat and Restoring Sediment Flow (USA) Not assessed Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Port Angeles, WA, United States of America —
The Pinelands Development Credit Program — Market-Based Land Preservation in New Jersey's Pine Barrens Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice New Lisbon, United States of America —
North Yuba Forest Resilience Bond — Investor-Financed Wildfire-Risk Reduction for a Water-Supply Watershed Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Marysville, United States of America —
MWRA Quabbin–Wachusett Watershed Protection Program (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Boston, United States of America —
US Wetland Mitigation Banking — CWA Section 404 Compensatory Mitigation Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Washington, United States of America —
Rio Grande Water Fund — Consortium-Financed Forest Restoration to Protect New Mexico's Water (USA) Not assessed Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Santa Fe, United States of America —
Klamath River Dam Removal — Four Dams Removed, 360+ River Miles Reopened to Salmon (USA) Not assessed Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Klamath, CA, United States of America —
Montgomery County's Agricultural Reserve — Four Decades of Transferable Development Rights to Save Maryland Farmland Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Poolesville, United States of America —
Philadelphia's Green City, Clean Waters — 25-Year Green Stormwater Infrastructure Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Philadelphia, United States of America —
Hetch Hetchy Filtration-Avoidance Watershed Protection (San Francisco, USA) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 47/100 Good practice San Francisco, United States of America —
Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 47/100 Good practice St. Paul, United States of America —
NYC Green Infrastructure Program — Rain Gardens and Permeable Surfaces to Cut Combined Sewer Overflows Not assessed Top 58% 40/100 Good practice New York City, United States of America —
Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary — Constructed Wetlands Treating Municipal Wastewater (USA) Not assessed Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Arcata, United States of America —
Portland Green Streets & Tabor to the River — Bioswales Replacing Pipes in a Combined-Sewer Basin Not assessed Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Portland, United States of America —
Carbon by Indigo — National Soil-Carbon Payment Program Not assessed Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Boston, United States of America —
Street Edge Alternatives (SEA Streets) — Seattle's Natural Drainage Retrofit Cutting Stormwater Volume by 97% (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Seattle, United States of America —