evidoria

Browse practices

Topic: PES schemes clear · back to the knowledge map

This selection at a glance

216
matching practices
6%
strong evidence, of 216 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 14
Observational / pre–post 130
Descriptive / self-reported 72

Most practices in: United States of America (13) · Brazil (8) · Australia (7)

Results

216 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
UK Peatland Code Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 1% 93/100 Good practice Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Bhutan for Life — Project Finance for Permanence (Bhutan) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Thimphu, Bhutan
Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 87/100 Good practice San José, Costa Rica
Green Heart of Cork: PES in the Portuguese montado Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Coruche, Portugal
Japan Forest Environment Transfer Tax (Rinshin Kankyō Jōyo Zei) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 2% 80/100 Good practice Tokyo, Japan
Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project (Bolivia) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 2% 80/100 Good practice San Ignacio de Velasco, Bolivia
Argentina Native Forest Conservation Fund — Ley 26.331 (FNECBN) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Buenos Aires, Argentina
DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Inongo, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
Kasigau Corridor REDD+ Project (Kenya) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Voi, Kenya
West Arnhem Land Fire Abatement (WALFA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Jabiru, Australia
Woodland Carbon Code (UK) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Edinburgh, United Kingdom
United Utilities Sustainable Catchment Management Programme (SCaMP) — Peatland & Farm Restoration for Drinking Water (Peak District & Forest of Bowland, UK) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Glossop, United Kingdom
Denver Water — From Forests to Faucets Watershed Protection Partnership (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Denver, United States of America
LIFE PeatCarbon — Baltic Peatland Rewetting and Carbon Standard (Latvia) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Riga, Latvia
Acre SISA - State System of Incentives for Environmental Services (Brazil) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Rio Branco, Brazil
Indonesia East Kalimantan Jurisdictional Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF Carbon Fund) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Samarinda, Indonesia
Estonia Natura 2000 Compensation Payments — Private Forest and Farmland Management Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia
Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
Portugal Ecosystem Services Remuneration Programme — Serra do Açor & Tejo Internacional Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Coimbra, Portugal
China Sloping Land Conversion Programme (Grain for Green / SLCP) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Beijing, China
Kuamut Rainforest Conservation Project (Sabah, Malaysia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Tongod, Malaysia
Spain PEPAC Eco-scheme for Dehesa & Agroforestry Systems (2023-2027) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Madrid, Spain
Makira Forest Protection REDD+ Project (Madagascar) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Maroantsetra, Madagascar
Oddar Meanchey Community Forestry REDD+ (Cambodia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Samraong, Cambodia