Top 58%
en este catálogo (917 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced1/3
PFES includes forest-carbon services and a national satellite biomass-monitoring database exists, but district-level (Lam Dong) evidence is the only documented case directly linking satellite verification to PFES payments, so outcome evidence is thin.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced1/3
PFES's service categories include landscape-beauty and biodiversity conservation, but no biodiversity outcome metrics (species counts, habitat condition) are reported in the sources reviewed.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control2/3
Hydropower operators and water utilities supply the large majority of PFES revenue (~VND 10,000bn, 2008-2018) explicitly to pay for watershed-protection services, giving this dimension the strongest financial evidence trail of the five.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
Not applicable — the sources reviewed do not document a fire-resilience component of this scheme.
Governance, certification & transferability2/3
Institutionalised nationally since 2010 (Decree 99/2010), first in Asia, with transparent revenue accounting (~16% of the forest-protection budget) — but peer-reviewed evaluation literature explicitly flags weak ecological monitoring and evaluation, capping this below top marks.
Evidoria. Pago por Servicios Ambientales Forestales de Vietnam — Verificación de la Cobertura Forestal Asistida por Satélite. ID persistente: f8c5ed67-8353-42ae-ac8e-6a94ebb2c803.