evidoria

What works in Tajikistan

All catalogues

9
evaluated practices
49/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Tajikistan

Tajikistan is implementing AI-focused educational initiatives to modernize teacher training and student learning: ICT-CST's three-tier teacher competency framework trained 35+ teachers with 92% rating it 'very useful', while Project Soro piloted an AI curriculum in 30 Dushanbe schools (770 teachers, 2,000+ students) and scaled to 100 schools by mid-2026, targeting all 4,000 schools and 2 million students by 2027. Outside education, the country has addressed vulnerability among migrant families through UN Women and IOM's programme that trained 3,000 abandoned wives in livelihoods and won formal state recognition for this vulnerable group in 2015. Rural economic development has been supported by the World Bank's REDP grant programme, which distributed 526 matching grants to MSMEs in remote regions and created an estimated 1,500 jobs by 2024.

Drawn from: ICT-CST — Tajikistan's National AI Micro-Certification Pathway for Teachers · Project Soro — Tajikistan's National AI Curriculum and Tajik-Language Chatbot for 2 Million Students · Empowering Abandoned Families of Labour Migrants — Tajikistan · Rural Economy Development Project (REDP) — Tajikistan's World Bank-Funded Tourism and Agribusiness Grants Programme · Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods Project (ELMARL) — Tajikistan · Socio-Economic Resilience Strengthening Project - Youth Digital Literacy · RESILAND CA+ Tajikistan Resilient Landscape Restoration Project — Vakhsh Catchment · TajRupt AI Lab — Four-Month Machine-Learning Training for Tajik Youth in Dushanbe and Khujand

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +58 pts 100 here · 42 average

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Evidence of learning impact +28 pts 56 here · 28 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +8 pts 56 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -9 pts 56 here · 64 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transferability / replicability -15 pts 44 here · 59 average

Scalability & sustainability -17 pts 47 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Innovation level -36 pts 27 here · 63 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -67 pts 11 here · 78 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
100 · 42
Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
83 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
56 · 28
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 48
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Equity & inclusion
44 · 52
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Transferability / replicability
44 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
47 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 59
Innovation level
27 · 63
Efficiency
0 · 44
Sustainability (ongoing)
11 · 78
Documented learning
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Tajikistan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

ICT-CST — Tajikistan's National AI Micro-Certification Pathway for Teachers · 67

Project Soro — Tajikistan's National AI Curriculum and Tajik-Language Chatbot for 2 Million Students · 60

Empowering Abandoned Families of Labour Migrants — Tajikistan · 59

Rural Economy Development Project (REDP) — Tajikistan's World Bank-Funded Tourism and Agribusiness Grants Programme · 57

Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods Project (ELMARL) — Tajikistan · 53

Socio-Economic Resilience Strengthening Project - Youth Digital Literacy · 44

RESILAND CA+ Tajikistan Resilient Landscape Restoration Project — Vakhsh Catchment · 40

TajRupt AI Lab — Four-Month Machine-Learning Training for Tajik Youth in Dushanbe and Khujand · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Tajikistan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more