Browse practices
Topic: Urban innovation & experimentation clear · back to the knowledge map
This selection at a glance
19
matching practices
0%
strong evidence, of 22 assessed
Evidence mix
-3 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.
Most practices in: Finland (3) · Austria (2) · Germany (2)
Results
| Select | Title | Evidence | Standing | Type | Location | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart City Wien Framework Strategy | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 1% 95/100 | Good practice | Vienna, Austria | — | |
| Forum Virium Helsinki — agile piloting in urban living labs | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 1% 95/100 | Good practice | Helsinki, Finland | — | |
| Smart Open Lisboa | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 1% 95/100 | Good practice | Lisbon, Portugal | — | |
| Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 4% 91/100 | Good practice | Leuven, Belgium | — | |
| Unleash Your Geek Innovation Challenge | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 4% 91/100 | Good practice | San José, United States of America | — | |
| Mayor’s Regeneration Fund (MRF) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 4% 91/100 | Good practice | London, United Kingdom | — | |
| Hiedanranta — a smart, circular district as a testbed (Tampere) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 10% 86/100 | Good practice | Tampere, Finland | — | |
| BIP/ZIP (Neighborhoods and Priority Intervention Zones) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 10% 86/100 | Good practice | Lisbon, Portugal | — | |
| Copenhagen Solutions Lab | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 10% 86/100 | Good practice | Copenhagen, Denmark | — | |
| The Socially Integrative City (SIC) / Soziale Stadt Programme / name change in 2019 from “Social City” to “Social Cohesion” | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 10% 86/100 | Good practice | Berlin, Germany | — | |
| San Jose Technology Demonstration Center | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 19% 81/100 | Good practice | San José, United States of America | — | |
| Munich's Innovation Challenge | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 19% 81/100 | Good practice | Munich, Germany | — | |
| Torino City Lab — real-world urban testing laboratory | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 29% 76/100 | Good practice | Turin, Italy | — | |
| Challenge LDN: Open Innovation Challenges | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 29% 76/100 | Good practice | London, United Kingdom | — | |
| Eindhoven Museum / Museum door de Stad | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 29% 76/100 | Good practice | Eindhoven, Netherlands | — | |
| Barcelona Innova: Strategy for Boosting Urban Innovation in Barcelona | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 29% 76/100 | Good practice | Barcelona, Spain | — | |
| The Gonesse Digital Factory [La Fabrique Numérique de Gonesse] | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Gonesse, France | Local | |
| Smart Dublin — open-innovation testbeds across the four Dublin local authorities | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 42% 71/100 | Good practice | Dublin, Ireland | — | |
| Hangzhou ET City Brain — China's AI platform for smart city governance and traffic management | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 66% 53/100 | Good practice | Hangzhou, China | — |