Browse practices
Topic: Climate, Environment & Biodiversity clear · back to the knowledge map
This selection at a glance
347
matching practices
6%
strong evidence, of 549 assessed
Evidence mix
-202 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.
Most practices in: United States of America (27) · Australia (17) · United Kingdom (14)
Results
| Select | Title | Evidence | Standing | Type | Location | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK Peatland Code | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 1% 93/100 | Good practice | Edinburgh, United Kingdom | — | |
| Green Belt Movement — Women-Led Reforestation and Environmental Governance, Kenya (1977–present) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 20% 89/100 | Good practice | Nairobi, Kenya | — | |
| Belarus National Peatland Rewetting Programme — 89,400 ha Restored (2007–2030) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Minsk, Belarus | — | |
| Bhutan for Life — Project Finance for Permanence (Bhutan) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Thimphu, Bhutan | — | |
| Mpingo Conservation & Development Initiative (Tanzania) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Kilwa Masoko, Tanzania | — | |
| Katingan Mentaya REDD+ Peatland Conservation Project (Indonesia) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Palangkaraya, Indonesia | — | |
| Working for Water (South Africa) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Cape Town, South Africa | — | |
| Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | San José, Costa Rica | — | |
| Green Heart of Cork: PES in the Portuguese montado | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 2% 87/100 | Good practice | Coruche, Portugal | — | |
| Google Flood Hub — Bangladesh Water Development Board's AI-Powered River Flood Alert System | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 13% 80/100 | Good practice | Dhaka, Bangladesh | — | |
| Moscow Region Peatland Rewetting Programme (Russia) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 80/100 | Good practice | Shatura, Russia | — | |
| Japan Forest Environment Transfer Tax (Rinshin Kankyō Jōyo Zei) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 2% 80/100 | Good practice | Tokyo, Japan | — | |
| Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project (Bolivia) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 2% 80/100 | Good practice | San Ignacio de Velasco, Bolivia | — | |
| Delta Blue Carbon — Indus Delta Mangrove Restoration (Pakistan) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 2% 80/100 | Good practice | Thatta, Pakistan | — | |
| LIFE for MIRES — Trans-boundary Peatland Restoration in Šumava & Bavarian Forest (Czech Republic–Germany) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Vimperk, Czechia | — | |
| U Minh Thượng Integrated Water & Fire Management — Peat Swamp Forest Protection (Vietnam) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | U Minh Thượng, Vietnam | — | |
| Moss Layer Transfer Technique — Canadian Peatland Restoration Standard | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Québec City, Canada | — | |
| LIFE Mires Estonia — National Peatland Rewetting Programme | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Tartu, Estonia | — | |
| Peatland ACTION (Scotland) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Edinburgh, United Kingdom | — | |
| Humbo Ethiopia Assisted Natural Regeneration Project | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Humbo, Ethiopia | — | |
| New Zealand National Wilding Conifer Control Programme | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — | |
| Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Programme (GCFRP) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Kumasi, Ghana | — | |
| Argentina Native Forest Conservation Fund — Ley 26.331 (FNECBN) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Buenos Aires, Argentina | — | |
| DRC Mai-Ndombe Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF / World Bank) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Inongo, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the) | — |