Top 89%
en este catálogo (1069 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Transferability / replicability1/3
The case shows how a member state with long-standing pay surveys can stall transposition, a risk other governments with existing regimes may face.
Impact on gender equality0/1
No pay-gap effect can be attributed to a paused legislative process.
Effectiveness0/1
Sweden missed the 7 June 2026 deadline and the Commission declined a 'stop the clock' on 22 May 2026.
Efficiency0/1
The stated aim was to lower administrative burden, but no cost figures were published to test that claim.
Evaluated outcomes0/1
No evaluation exists; the decision is a policy pause, not an implemented measure.
Sustainability0/1
The bill is paused with no Riksdag proposal planned, so the new obligations lack a continuity path.
Achievement / evidence0/1
Nothing was enacted: the start date moved from 1 July 2026 to 1 January 2027 and then the process was halted on 26 March 2026.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
Sweden's existing annual pay surveys (lönekartläggning) remain in force, so the gap is the directive's added reporting and worker-access rights.
Curator validation1/1
Dates cross-checked across several independent legal and HR sources; included as a cautionary case.
Evidoria. Suspensión por Suecia de la transposición de la Directiva de transparencia retributiva (2026) — caso de advertencia. ID persistente: bb3765b0-f08f-4bec-8dd8-0f6cb7355c45.