evidoria

Browse practices

Topic: Biodiversity & restoration clear · back to the knowledge map

This selection at a glance

205
matching practices
7%
strong evidence, of 231 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 17
Observational / pre–post 145
Descriptive / self-reported 69

-26 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.

Most practices in: United States of America (13) · Australia (8) · United Kingdom (7)

Results

205 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
UK Peatland Code Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 1% 93/100 Good practice Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Green Belt Movement — Women-Led Reforestation and Environmental Governance, Kenya (1977–present) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 20% 89/100 Good practice Nairobi, Kenya
Belarus National Peatland Rewetting Programme — 89,400 ha Restored (2007–2030) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Minsk, Belarus
Mpingo Conservation & Development Initiative (Tanzania) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Kilwa Masoko, Tanzania
Katingan Mentaya REDD+ Peatland Conservation Project (Indonesia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Palangkaraya, Indonesia
Working for Water (South Africa) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 87/100 Good practice Cape Town, South Africa
Moscow Region Peatland Rewetting Programme (Russia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 80/100 Good practice Shatura, Russia
Delta Blue Carbon — Indus Delta Mangrove Restoration (Pakistan) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 80/100 Good practice Thatta, Pakistan
LIFE for MIRES — Trans-boundary Peatland Restoration in Šumava & Bavarian Forest (Czech Republic–Germany) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Vimperk, Czechia
U Minh Thượng Integrated Water & Fire Management — Peat Swamp Forest Protection (Vietnam) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice U Minh Thượng, Vietnam
Moss Layer Transfer Technique — Canadian Peatland Restoration Standard Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Québec City, Canada
LIFE Mires Estonia — National Peatland Rewetting Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Tartu, Estonia
Peatland ACTION (Scotland) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Humbo Ethiopia Assisted Natural Regeneration Project Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Humbo, Ethiopia
New Zealand National Wilding Conifer Control Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Wellington, New Zealand
Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Programme (GCFRP) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Kumasi, Ghana
Trees for Global Benefits (Plan Vivo, Uganda) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 5% 73/100 Good practice Mbarara, Uganda
Women-Led Mercury-Free Gold Mining and Reforestation in Peru's Madre de Dios Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 48% 70/100 Good practice Puerto Maldonado, Peru
Kopuatai Peat Dome Ramsar Wetland Management (Waikato, New Zealand) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Paeroa, New Zealand
United Utilities Sustainable Catchment Management Programme (SCaMP) — Peatland & Farm Restoration for Drinking Water (Peak District & Forest of Bowland, UK) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Glossop, United Kingdom
LIFE Tourbières du Jura — Peatland Rehabilitation Programme (France) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Frasne, France
EthioTrees Dryland Restoration Project (Tigray, Ethiopia) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Dogu'a Tembien, Ethiopia
Denver Water — From Forests to Faucets Watershed Protection Partnership (USA) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Denver, United States of America
LIFE Peat Restore — Fen Rewetting in Słowiński National Park (Poland) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 9% 67/100 Good practice Smołdzino, Poland