Browse practices
This selection at a glance
137
matching practices
1%
strong evidence, of 137 assessed
Evidence mix
Most practices in: Estonia (10) · Malta (8) · Netherlands (8)
Results
| Select | Title | Evidence | Standing | Type | Location | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empowerment delle Donne con l’Industria 4.0 | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 9% 96/100 | Good practice | /, Italy | National | |
| Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 10% 96/100 | Good practice | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | — | |
| Elements of AI — Free, Multilingual Course Bringing AI Literacy to Millions | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 10% 96/100 | Good practice | Helsinki, Finland | — | |
| F13 — Baden-Württemberg's Sovereign AI Assistant for Civil Servants, Adopted Statewide by Thüringen | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 1% 93/100 | Good practice | Stuttgart, Germany | — | |
| Funka's MeAC Studies -- Measuring e-Accessibility Progress Across Europe | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 24% 92/100 | Good practice | Stockholm, Sweden | — | |
| Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 3% 91/100 | Good practice | Tallinn, Estonia | — | |
| Women in AI Poland (WAI - Women in AI) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 17% 89/100 | Good practice | Katowice, Poland | Regional | |
| Women in the Development of Artificial Intelligence | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 17% 89/100 | Good practice | Katowice, Poland | Regional | |
| MCA-FITA Web Accessibility Monitoring — Malta's In-Depth Reviews Average Just 50% | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 30% 88/100 | Good practice | Floriana, Malta | — | |
| Traficom's Digital Accessibility Supervision — Statutory EN 301 549/WCAG Enforcement for Finland's Public Digital Services | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 30% 88/100 | Good practice | Helsinki, Finland | — | |
| ChileCompra's Preventive Data-Intelligence System — Chile Flags Conflicts of Interest Before Contracts Are Awarded | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Santiago, Chile | — | |
| Copilot for Flanders — Digitaal Vlaanderen's Civil-Service AI Pilot Scales Into a 10,000-Licence Government Rollout | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Brussels, Belgium | — | |
| FRAIA — the Netherlands' Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment, Piloted Across 15 Government Algorithms | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | The Hague, Netherlands | — | |
| data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg | — | |
| Norway's National AI Regulatory Sandbox — Testing High-Risk and Generative AI Before Deployment | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Oslo, Norway | — | |
| LitAI State Data Lake — Lithuania's national AI-powered government data platform | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Vilnius, Lithuania | — | |
| Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 6% 87/100 | Good practice | Tallinn, Estonia | — | |
| Copenhagen Solutions Lab | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 9% 86/100 | Good practice | Copenhagen, Denmark | — | |
| DIGG's 2022–2024 Monitoring of Digital Public Services — Sweden's DOS-Law Accessibility Oversight | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 31% 84/100 | Good practice | Sundsvall, Sweden | — | |
| Tallinn Smart City — Europe's first capital with free public transit for residents and fully digital city services | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 17% 81/100 | Good practice | Tallinn, Estonia | — | |
| Kreis Borken's Agentic-AI Pilot Cuts Long-Term-Care Application Processing by a Fifth | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 12% 80/100 | Good practice | Borken, Germany | — | |
| AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 12% 80/100 | Good practice | Athens, Greece | — | |
| Overheidsbrede Monitor Generatieve AI — the Netherlands' Government-Wide Tracker of GenAI Use by Civil Servants | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 12% 80/100 | Good practice | The Hague, Netherlands | — | |
| Agentic AI Hub — Germany's Federal Pilot for Agentic AI in Municipal Administration | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 12% 80/100 | Good practice | Berlin, Germany | — |