evidoria

Browse practices

This selection at a glance

97
matching practices
1%
strong evidence, of 97 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 1
Observational / pre–post 27
Descriptive / self-reported 69

Most practices in: Estonia (9) · Malta (7) · Netherlands (7)

Results

97 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
Empowerment delle Donne con l’Industria 4.0 Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 12% 96/100 Good practice /, Italy National
Luxembourg's Open-Data Accessibility Monitoring — Six Years of Published Audits, and Only 2 of ~900 Services Compliant Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 96/100 Good practice Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Elements of AI — Free, Multilingual Course Bringing AI Literacy to Millions Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 96/100 Good practice Helsinki, Finland
Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 4% 91/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia
Women in AI Poland (WAI - Women in AI) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 20% 89/100 Good practice Katowice, Poland Regional
Women in the Development of Artificial Intelligence Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 20% 89/100 Good practice Katowice, Poland Regional
ChileCompra's Preventive Data-Intelligence System — Chile Flags Conflicts of Interest Before Contracts Are Awarded Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Santiago, Chile
Copilot for Flanders — Digitaal Vlaanderen's Civil-Service AI Pilot Scales Into a 10,000-Licence Government Rollout Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Brussels, Belgium
FRAIA — the Netherlands' Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment, Piloted Across 15 Government Algorithms Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 6% 87/100 Good practice The Hague, Netherlands
data.europa.eu's eTranslation — Automated Neural Machine Translation of Open-Data Metadata Across 24 EU Languages Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
Norway's National AI Regulatory Sandbox — Testing High-Risk and Generative AI Before Deployment Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Oslo, Norway
LitAI State Data Lake — Lithuania's national AI-powered government data platform Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Vilnius, Lithuania
Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 6% 87/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia
Copenhagen Solutions Lab Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 10% 86/100 Good practice Copenhagen, Denmark
Tallinn Smart City — Europe's first capital with free public transit for residents and fully digital city services Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 19% 81/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia
AI-Assisted Legal Review at the Hellenic Cadastre — Cutting a National Backlog by Up to 90% Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 80/100 Good practice Athens, Greece
Overheidsbrede Monitor Generatieve AI — the Netherlands' Government-Wide Tracker of GenAI Use by Civil Servants Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 80/100 Good practice The Hague, Netherlands
Agentic AI Hub — Germany's Federal Pilot for Agentic AI in Municipal Administration Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 80/100 Good practice Berlin, Germany
Børge — Denmark's AI writing assistant for the borger.dk citizen portal's editors Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 14% 80/100 Good practice Copenhagen, Denmark
Estonia's AI Leap 2025 — national AI in schools Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 3% 80/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia
Diia and Diia.AI — Ukraine's Digital State Platform and National AI Government Agent Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 80/100 Good practice Kyiv, Ukraine
Kela — AI document pre-processing for benefit applications (Finland) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 14% 80/100 Good practice Helsinki, Finland
Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 29% 76/100 Good practice Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sofia Tech Park Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 29% 76/100 Good practice Sofia, Bulgaria