Browse practices
Topic: Disability & accessibility clear · back to the knowledge map
This selection at a glance
79
matching practices
2%
strong evidence, of 89 assessed
Evidence mix
-10 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.
Most practices in: United Kingdom (8) · United States of America (8) · Kenya (4)
Results
| Select | Title | Evidence | Standing | Type | Location | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annie: Self-Learning Braille Literacy Device Scaling Across India and Beyond | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 9% 96/100 | Good practice | Bengaluru, India | — | |
| Signs TV & assistALL (Signs Media Kenya) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 9% 96/100 | Good practice | Nairobi, Kenya | — | |
| Sugamya Pustakalaya: India's National Accessible Digital Library for Print-Disabled Readers | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 23% 92/100 | Good practice | New Delhi, India | — | |
| NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 23% 92/100 | Good practice | Brisbane, Australia | — | |
| eKitabu Accessible Content Program: Born-Accessible Books & Kenyan Sign Language Storytelling | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 23% 92/100 | Good practice | Nairobi, Kenya | — | |
| ASAN Xidmet — One-Stop Digital Public Service Centres | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 23% 92/100 | Good practice | Baku, Azerbaijan | — | |
| National Relay Service — Auslan Video Relay Service (Australia) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 29% 88/100 | Good practice | Canberra, Australia | — | |
| Sorenson Video Relay Service — FCC-Funded ASL Video Interpreting | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 29% 88/100 | Good practice | Salt Lake City, United States of America | — | |
| FEMIS Disability-Identification Algorithm — Targeting Inclusive-Education Grants in Fiji | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 3% 80/100 | Good practice | Suva, Fiji | — | |
| OrCam MyEye: AI Wearable Reading Device for Blind and Low-Vision Users — A Cautionary Case | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 38% 76/100 | Good practice | Jerusalem, Israel | — | |
| RIX Wiki | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 38% 76/100 | Good practice | London, United Kingdom | Transnational | |
| Eye-Gaze Assistive Technology for Students with Severe Motor and Communication Difficulties — Chang Gung University's Taiwan Feasibility Studies | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 8% 73/100 | Good practice | Taoyuan, Taiwan | — | |
| Dysolve — First Independent Randomized Controlled Trial of an AI Reading-Intervention for the Lowest-Performing US Readers | Evidence: Randomised controlled trial | Top 8% 73/100 | Good practice | Newark, United States of America | — | |
| ICB4VI — AI Digital-Literacy Training for Blind and Visually Impaired Adults in Senegal | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 8% 73/100 | Good practice | Dakar, Senegal | — | |
| Jamaica Accessible Digital Textbooks (ADT) — AI-Enhanced Storybooks for Students with Disabilities | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 8% 73/100 | Good practice | Kingston, Jamaica | — | |
| Cboard — Open-Source AAC Platform for Children with Speech and Language Impairments | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 8% 73/100 | Good practice | Córdoba, Argentina | — | |
| Weibernetz e.V. | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 45% 73/100 | Good practice | unspecified, Germany | National | |
| Universal Access Fund: Smartphones & Assistive Technology for Vulnerable Citizens | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Mbabane, Eswatini | — | |
| AccessAbility Bahamas Mobile App | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Nassau, Bahamas | — | |
| ICT teacher training for working with disabled participants | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Szeged, Hungary | National | |
| Project for e-Accessible Education | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Skopje, Macedonia | National | |
| Centre for Assistive Technology | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Skopje, Macedonia | National | |
| CleverCogs | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 54% 72/100 | Good practice | Dundee, United Kingdom | Regional | |
| Kuwait National Framework for Digital Accessibility | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 59% 68/100 | Good practice | Kuwait City, Kuwait | — |