evidoria

Browse practices

This selection at a glance

130
matching practices
8%
strong evidence, of 130 assessed

Evidence mix

Randomised controlled trial 1
Quasi-experimental 10
Observational / pre–post 79
Descriptive / self-reported 40

Most practices in: Germany (8) · Spain (7) · Sweden (7)

Results

130 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
Smart City Wien Framework Strategy Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 1% 95/100 Good practice Vienna, Austria —
Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 3% 91/100 Good practice Leuven, Belgium —
ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability: Bonn's Global Municipal Peer-Learning Network Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 9% 86/100 Good practice Bonn, Germany —
CurieuzeNeuzen Vlaanderen — Belgium's 20,000-Point Citizen Science Air Quality Map Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 17% 81/100 Good practice Antwerp, Belgium —
Conservation and Restoration of Mire Habitats — Estonia's LIFE Mires Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 2% 80/100 Good practice Tallinn, Estonia —
Peru's Geobosques Early-Warning System - MINAM's Satellite Deforestation Alerts, Tested by a Randomized Trial Evidence: Randomised controlled trial Top 12% 80/100 Good practice Lima, Peru —
CLAIRO — Urban Forest Living Lab for Cleaner Air Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 76/100 Good practice Ostrava, Czechia —
INNOAIR — On-Demand AI Electric Transit for Cleaner Air Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 27% 76/100 Good practice Sofia, Bulgaria —
Stockholm Royal Seaport — fossil-free urban development testbed Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 76/100 Good practice Stockholm, Sweden —
North Kimberley Fire Abatement Project — Traditional Owner-Led Savanna-Burning Carbon Businesses (Western Australia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 4% 73/100 Good practice Wyndham, Australia —
LIFE for MIRES — Trans-boundary Peatland Restoration in Šumava & Bavarian Forest (Czech Republic–Germany) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 4% 73/100 Good practice Vimperk, Czechia —
LIFE Mires Estonia — National Peatland Rewetting Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 4% 73/100 Good practice Tartu, Estonia —
CONSERV — Twice-Yearly Payments for Legally Clearable Forest, Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Cuiabá, Brazil —
Fish River Fire Project — Indigenous Savanna-Burning Carbon Abatement (Northern Territory, Australia) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Fish River Station, Australia —
LIFE Tourbières du Jura — Peatland Rehabilitation Programme (France) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Frasne, France —
LIFE Peat Restore — Fen Rewetting in Słowiński National Park (Poland) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Smołdzino, Poland —
LIFE PeatCarbon — Baltic Peatland Rewetting and Carbon Standard (Latvia) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 7% 67/100 Good practice Riga, Latvia —
DHMZ's AI-Based Three-Day Air Quality Forecast — Croatia Adapts Belgium's Machine-Learning ATMOSYS System Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 46% 60/100 Good practice Zagreb, Croatia —
LeakTracer — New Mexico's Statewide Satellite AI Leak-Detection Program Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 46% 60/100 Good practice Truth or Consequences, United States of America —
Skjern River Restoration — Denmark's Largest River Re-Meandering & Floodplain Rewetting Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Skjern, Denmark —
WETLIFE 2 — Hydrological Restoration of the Amalva and Kamanos Raised Bogs (Lithuania) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Marijampolė, Lithuania —
Switzerland Federal Biodiversity Contributions (Agri-Environment PES) Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Bern, Switzerland —
Mongolia's Green Gold Programme — National Pasture User Groups for Rotational Grazing and Rangeland Recovery Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia —
GreenDanube — Amorpha fruticosa Clearance and Floodplain Restoration on Romania's Danube Islands Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Călărași, Romania —