evidoria

Browse practices

Topic: Invasive species clear · back to the knowledge map

This selection at a glance

37
matching practices
14%
strong evidence, of 37 assessed

Evidence mix

Quasi-experimental 5
Observational / pre–post 28
Descriptive / self-reported 4

Most practices in: South Africa (4) · Australia (3) · United States of America (3)

Results

37 result(s) Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List
SelectTitleEvidenceStandingTypeLocationScale
Working for Water (South Africa) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 1% 87/100 Good practice Cape Town, South Africa —
New Zealand National Wilding Conifer Control Programme Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 4% 73/100 Good practice Wellington, New Zealand —
Kosciuszko National Park — Feral Horse Exclusion for Alpine Sphagnum Bog & Peatland Recovery (Australia) Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Jindabyne, Australia —
Protecting Country Against Invasive Species — Indigenous Ranger-Led Control (Northern Australia) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Darwin, Australia —
Hawai'i Watershed Partnerships (HAWP) — Cooperative Forest Protection Against Invasive Species Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 Good practice Honolulu, United States of America —
Greater Cape Town Water Fund — Invasive Alien Vegetation Clearing for Water Security (South Africa) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Cape Town, South Africa —
Dutch Water Boards' Muskrat & Coypu Control Programme — Nationwide Dike Protection (Netherlands) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Utrecht, Netherlands —
Redonda Ecosystem Reserve — Rat and Goat Eradication (Antigua and Barbuda) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Redonda, Antigua and Barbuda —
GECI Island Restoration Programme — Invasive Mammal Eradication (Mexico) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Ensenada, Mexico —
Project Isabela — Galápagos Archipelago-Wide Goat & Pig Eradication Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Puerto Villamil, Ecuador —
Greater Cape Town Water Fund (South Africa) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 Good practice Cape Town, South Africa —
LIFE Ilhas Barreira — Predator Removal & Seabird Recovery on Ria Formosa's Barrier Islands (Portugal) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Faro, Portugal —
Round Island Ecosystem Restoration — Invasive Mammal Eradication (Mauritius) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Port Louis, Mauritius —
Nutria Eradication Project (Nakdong River Basin, South Korea) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Changwon, South Korea —
Working for Wetlands (South Africa) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Pretoria, South Africa —
New Zealand Jobs for Nature — Mahi mō te Taiao Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 Good practice Wellington, New Zealand —
Lord Howe Island Rodent Eradication Project Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Lord Howe Island, Australia —
LIFE PonDerat — Black Rat Eradication on Inhabited Ventotene Island (Pontine Archipelago, Italy) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Ventotene, Italy —
Ascension Island Feral Cat Eradication and Seabird Recolonization Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Georgetown, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha —
Koʻolau Mountains Watershed Partnership — Corporate Water Replenishment Fence Project (Hawaiʻi, USA) Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Honolulu, United States of America —
Binational Beaver Control Programme — Tierra del Fuego (Argentina–Chile) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Ushuaia, Argentina —
Amami Oshima Mongoose Eradication Programme (Japan) Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Amami, Japan —
South Georgia Habitat Restoration Project — World's Largest Rodent Eradication Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 58% 40/100 Good practice Grytviken, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands —
Chagos Archipelago Rat Eradication & Seabird-Driven Reef Recovery (British Indian Ocean Territory) Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 76% 33/100 Good practice Peros Banhos, British Indian Ocean Territory —